Red Light Cameras and Car Insurance

Read now for the truth about red light cameras and car insurance. The fact of the matter is that these traffic cameras can actually increase auto insurance rates, and increase DMV and Emergency Services costs as well. Some states have been found guilty of shortening yellow lights, and others are using the cameras to find uninsured drivers. Learn more below and find cheaper insurance rates with our free quote comparison tool.

Free Insurance Comparison

 Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

Chris Tepedino is a feature writer that has written extensively about home, life, and car insurance for numerous websites. He has a college degree in communication from the University of Tennessee and has experience reporting, researching investigative pieces, and crafting detailed, data-driven features. His works have been featured on CB Blog Nation, Flow Words, Healing Law, WIBW Kansas, and C...

Full Bio →

Written by

Laura Walker graduated college with a BS in Criminal Justice with a minor in Political Science. She married her husband and began working in the family insurance business in 2005. She became a licensed agent and wrote P&C business focusing on personal lines insurance for 10 years. Laura serviced existing business and wrote new business. She now uses her insurance background to help educate...

Full Bio →

Reviewed by Laura Walker
Former Licensed Agent

UPDATED: Jul 16, 2021

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right coverage choices.

Advertiser Disclosure: We strive to help you make confident insurance decisions. Comparison shopping should be easy. We are not affiliated with any one insurance company and cannot guarantee quotes from any single insurance company.

Our insurance industry partnerships don’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own. To compare quotes from many different insurance companies please enter your ZIP code above to use the free quote tool. The more quotes you compare, the more chances to save.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by insurance experts.

Nobody likes those cameras that are mounted at highway exits and intersections, designed to catch speeders on film. But the fact is, they are virtually everywhere. These cameras are said to reduce accidents by giving people traffic tickets in their mailbox instead of being pulled over in dangerous traffic conditions.

The theory behind these cameras is that they provide the benefit of reduced car insurance costs because people will drive safer, knowing that these cameras can catch reckless drivers in the act. It has also been stated that these cameras save taxpayer money as well. All of these things have been said, but the truth is these statements are false.

There may be an increased risk of accidents in areas where these cameras are located. People get nervous about the prospect of getting a ticket in the mail and have been known to slam on the breaks to avoid getting their picture taken. This can cause accidents to increase.

It is worth noting that some studies do prove these cameras reduce accidents, but every study that supports this fact has been funded by car insurance companies.

Is this a coincidence or are the results being returned from these studies skewed?

On the flip side, studies performed at the University of South Florida, North Carolina, Ontario Canada and Virginia show evidence that traffic cameras are not effective. Worse than being ineffective, these studies show that traffic cameras actually compound and increase severe accidents.

There is an organization that receives a lot of its funding from car insurance companies called the IIHS, or Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. This institute is the only one that has released study findings that indicate that traffic cameras are effective.

Analysis of the IIHS findings has revealed that there are some “major research design flaws” like incomplete statistics being used and bad analysis techniques too. The fact of the matter is that these traffic cameras that are funded by the public, result in increased DMV costs, Emergency Services costs and actually increase car insurance rates.

On a disappointing and related note, there have been several cities in the U.S. that have been found guilty of an insidious new practice. These cities have shortened the time of yellow lights in their districts. These shortened yellow lights cause more people to run red lights.

Another name for this practice is entrapment. Among the cities found guilty of this practice are Chattanooga, Tennessee and Union City, California. There are others that may be found guilty of this kind of driver entrapment in the near future.

A Michigan company called InsureNet has proposed using traffic cameras to identify uninsured drivers in Chicago. According to the ABA Journal, an Internet legal website, there are many jurisdictions across the country that are considering similar moves to what InsureNet has proposed. T

he cameras would take pictures of license plates and the plate numbers would be run against a database program to determine drivers that are driving without car insurance. This is a disturbing trend in the legal system. InsureNet even stated that in addition to Chicago, they anticipate 3 or 4 more states to sign on for this program in the very near future.

Free Insurance Comparison

Compare quotes from the top insurance companies and save!

 Secured with SHA-256 Encryption