Which is cheaper insurance for rental or vacation home?
UPDATED: Apr 24, 2017
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right coverage choices.
Advertiser Disclosure: We strive to help you make confident insurance decisions. Comparison shopping should be easy. We are not affiliated with any one insurance company and cannot guarantee quotes from any single insurance company.
Our insurance industry partnerships don’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own. To compare quotes from many different insurance companies please enter your ZIP code above to use the free quote tool. The more quotes you compare, the more chances to save.
Free Insurance Comparison
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Asked April 24, 2017
1 Answer
Typically, it is more expensive to insure a vacation rental property than it is to insure a rental property. For a rental property with a long-term tenant, you can obtain a landlord policy. A landlord policy will offer replacement cost coverage for the property as well as personal liability coverage and income replacement in the event that a tenant needs to move out of a property while repairs take place due to damage from a covered loss. The renter should also hold a separate, renters insurance policy which will cover the tenant’s personal property in the event of a loss.
Vacation rental properties are generally more expensive to insure for a couple of reasons. Insurance companies tend to view short term rentals as a higher risk than a monthly lease. In addition, vacation rentals are viewed as a business and therefore must be insured differently. Insurance of this nature will typically provide coverage for the building, its contents, commercial business liability, and business income replacement. Because vacation rental insurance is more comprehensive, it will cost more to insure a property being used for short term rentals as opposed to a long term monthly tenant.
Answered April 24, 2017 by FirstLight